Opinion

Published on Tuesday, August 26, 2008

column

Drinking age should be lowered – with added responsibility


By KAYLA KLING
Last updated on 00/00/0000 at 12:00 a.m.

The minimum legal drinking age is once again up for debate with college presidents signing the Amethyst Initiative, a call to rethink the current policies that deal with underage drinking.

One hundred twenty-eight college presidents are putting their reputations on the line against popular thinking by signing the Amethyst Initiative, which calls for re-examination of the current legal drinking age.

One has to wonder why college presidents would stake their reputation on such a controversial issue.

The American Medical Association (AMA) proves that the still-developing brain is damaged by drinking. Cringing parents, MADD and police officers are also against the initiative.

Critics claim college presidents are signing the initiative in order to not be held responsible for the problem of underage drinking. MADD states on their Web site the initiative is “misguided” and gives “deliberately misleading information to confuse the public on the effectiveness of 21 law.”

Alexander Wagenaar, a University of Florida epidemiologist, stated in an Aug. 19 article from the Associated Press “[College presidents] don’t want to deal with [the drinking problem].” Those who claim this as an argument haven’t looked at what the Amethyst Initiative is hoping for – a national debate on how to combat underage drinking effectively.

“I signed [it] not because I think there is an easy solution out there ... we need to be talking about solutions,” explained Lawrence Schall of Oglethorpe University.

Although AMA studies show underage drinking leads to damage of the frontal lobe of the brain, the studies note it is binge drinking that causes damage. The AMA’s Web site also states “providing more education about the harmful effects of alcohol abuse” is a solution.

The Amethyst Initiative aims exactly for that – alternative ways to deal with underage drinking. For clarification, the initiative does not mandate the legal drinking age be lowered to 18.
The Amethyst Initiative doesn’t sound like such a cringe-worthy plan to me.

Comment On This Article

All comments are moderated before being published. We will not edit your comments, but we also will not approve those that are abusive, off-topic, attack another poster or contain information we know to be libelous or false.

During peak weekday viewing times, most comments will be reviewed within six hours. For more detailed information, click here.

After submitting your comment, check below for a confirmation message.


  • Your name:
  • Enter text from image:
  • Your comment:
Question of the Day
Only who can prevent forest fires?
you
me

Sign up to receive Northern Star headlines in your inbox, delivered weekdays at 6 a.m.


Feedback? E-mail us.
Real-time updates of recently viewed articles on the site.

1  Autopsy set after Michael Jackson's sudden death

2  Track of the day - Clifford Brown and Max Roach

3  Tracking kegs a waste of time and money

4  City police blotter for Nov. 20

5  "Back to the '80s" rocks the Egyptian Theatre