Opinion

Published on Friday, September 21, 2007

editorial

Editorial: To get information from the University Police, it takes the strength of FOIA
By
Last updated on 00/00/0000 at 12:00 a.m.

Apparently, the long arm of the law can’t reach the keyboard.

The University Police, like any other police department – including DeKalb’s – produces a daily blotter listing the criminal and traffic crimes amassed on that particular day.

What sets the UP’s blotter apart from the blotter produced by those other departments – including DeKalb’s – is how often the UP’s blotter doesn’t seem to find its way onto the blotter page of the department’s official Web site.

Though one may find amusement in the misfortunes of others via the blotter, the real reason the public should be concerned is because of the department’s repeated blatant attempts to keep public information from the public.

On more than one occasion, the UP has not only failed to post its blotter from the previous day, but has failed to post its blotter from the previous several days, and rarely if ever has made public the blotter of the present day.

Not only was the Northern Star unable to post a blotter in its Sept. 19 edition as a result of the UP not posting it on the Web site, the Star has also found itself repeatedly jumping through flaming hoops of jargon in an attempt to deliver university crime news to readers in a clear, accurate and timely manner.

The Star has not only had to repeatedly ask the UP to post its blotter in a more timely fashion, but has had to go as far as filing Freedom of Information Act requests to obtain pertinent information on important crimes that would have been – and usually are – made immediately available by the UP’s DeKalb counterparts.

In one instance, the Star was told that once a certain crime pending investigation was closed, information would be made available; when the case was closed, the Star was still forced to use FOIA requests to obtain any information on the crime – outside of the information made available on the blotter, which hardly qualifies as information.

After all, in terms of semantics, “criminal sexual assault” could theoretically range anywhere between a sinful glance and a rape.

The UP has a duty to make this information as readily and easily available to the public as possible, because it is the department’s duty not just to abide by public records law, but it is their duty as police officials to provide the public with the information it needs to ensure individuals’ own personal safety and that of their loved ones.


By Ken Lowe  |  Saturday, September 22, 2007  |  4:59 pm
This editorial has been long overdue. Disclosure of the details of crimes has always been very bad on the part of the University Police. Whether it is a result of an actual attempt to cover up or minimize the perception of crime at NIU or it is simply laziness, not publishing the blotter is a violation of trust between law enforcement officials and the public.
By eldt  |  Saturday, September 22, 2007  |  10:44 pm
Failure to update their website blotter is just one of many problems with the UP website. For one, it is completely incompatible with Mac computers. It's completely unprofessional and inhibits accessibility of important information. In fact it is in violation of the 2002 Administrative Order of the Governor of Illinois that directs government agencies to abide by accessibility guidelines. Oh, and the Flash intro is completely unnecessary and ridiculous.
By Jar Jar Binks  |  Sunday, September 23, 2007  |  3:22 pm
A coed is the victim of an on-campus strong-arm robbery on Tuesday morning. One would think some kind of press release would be issued. For student "safety" don't ya know. Of course, if all the crime is being "prevented" (like that 59.23% crime rate drop) perhaps it's best to maintain the illusion that there really is no crime.
The Flash intro is consistent with a culture that thinks that wearing battle ribbons because one knows CPR or has a "PhD" impresses the ignorati.
By T T  |  Monday, September 24, 2007  |  3:55 pm
720 ILCS 5/12-13 Criminal Sexual Assault

The accused commits criminal sexual assault if he or she:

1. Commits and act of sexual “penetration” by the “use of force” or “threat of force”.

Pick up a book pal. Maybe even check the internet. You would be surprised at what’s on there. You seem to be fairly quick at taking jabs at others. How about exercising a little bit of that journalistic integrity? Verifying your information? Not being a moron?

You shouldn’t minimize the severity of rape by equating it to, how did you put it, “a sinful glance”? What in the above definition would make you think that a “sinful glance” is in the same ballpark as being forcibly held down and raped?

If you are all about accurate reporting, how about starting with yourself? You should be embarrassed. What would your mother have to say about you rating rape right down there with “a sinful glance”?

Nice work.
Comment On This Article

All comments are moderated before being published. We will not edit your comments, but we also will not approve those that are abusive, off-topic, attack another poster or contain information we know to be libelous or false.

During peak weekday viewing times, most comments will be reviewed within six hours. For more detailed information, click here.

After submitting your comment, check below for a confirmation message.


  • Your name:
  • Enter text from image:
  • Your comment:
Question of the Day
Only who can prevent forest fires?
you
me

Sign up to receive Northern Star headlines in your inbox, delivered weekdays at 6 a.m.


Feedback? E-mail us.
Real-time updates of recently viewed articles on the site.

1  Veterans can offer support in times of crisis

2  NIU looking to advance in MAC Tournament in...

3  "Back to the '80s" rocks the Egyptian Theatre

4  Track of the Day: 'Falling Apart' by Matt...

5  Adderall abused by college students looking for...