Opinion

Published on Thursday, January 29, 2009

Citizen input may make or break careers of Congressmen


By KEITH CAMERON
Last updated on 01/28/2009 at 10:01 p.m.

This week, Washington has focused on President Barack Obama’s economic stimulus package, but just a short time ago Roland Burris was the talk of the town. The newly-appointed state senator eventually gained acceptance from the Democratic party after being denied access to the Senate chamber.

Tony Wadas, junior political science major and president of the Campus Democrats, said he is sure politics come into play when representatives are appointed. He thinks Governor Rod Blagojevich probably wanted to leave a mark on Illinois by appointing Burris.

A Jan. 9 article from the Seattle Times even noted how Burris testified that he did not make a deal with the tainted Illinois governor. Burris just needed to assure everyone the sins of the governor were not passed on to his appointees. Then everything seemed fine — at least for a short time.

After Kirsten Gillibrand, the last senate appointee from New York, replaced Hillary Clinton, the real test started. While governors do have the ability to appoint senators when a seat opens, selecting politicians can be a risky move.

The factors that contribute to a representative selection are not completely clear, but one thing is certain: the citizenship has little say in the matter.

Andrew Bogda, senior geography major and president of the Campus Republicans, believes a governor should go with the will of the people when appointing a replacement representative. He favors voting over appointing.

“I would have favored a special election,” Bogda said.

A lack of public opinion may only be the beginning of problems for appointed representatives.

A Jan. 28 article from CBS news claims Republican party members are watching Burris and Gillibrand closely. Because the new senators are Democrats, GOP members hope close scrutiny will help win senate seats come election time. A representative not voted into office carries a weaker standing than one supported by a constituency.

Republicans are already attempting to stagnate legislation proposed by the Obama administration. If Burris and Gillibrand are associated with a majority party unable to bring change, their seats may fall to Republicans in the next election.

By appointing representatives from the same party, governors may just plug a hole. Politicians stay in office because a majority supports them. While special elections can be risky for a party majority, they favor the consensuses of citizens and construct secure relationships with voters.

This week, the appointees take their test. The GOP will probably watch more closely than the average citizen does, but that will change at election time. Any politician can fall from grace, but a politician without support can plummet to obscurity.

Comment On This Article

All comments are moderated before being published. We will not edit your comments, but we also will not approve those that are abusive, off-topic, attack another poster or contain information we know to be libelous or false.

During peak weekday viewing times, most comments will be reviewed within six hours. For more detailed information, click here.

After submitting your comment, check below for a confirmation message.


  • Your name:
  • Enter text from image:
  • Your comment:
Question of the Day
Only who can prevent forest fires?
you
me

Sign up to receive Northern Star headlines in your inbox, delivered weekdays at 6 a.m.


Feedback? E-mail us.
Real-time updates of recently viewed articles on the site.

1  Movie critics off-base with many reviews

2  SA Senate will wait to make changes to...

3  "Back to the '80s" rocks the Egyptian Theatre

4  Comic books hold a special meaning for everyone

5  Men's soccer settles for draw with late strikes