Opinion

Published on Friday, October 5, 2007

Column

Planned Parent Hood in Aurora faces problems from Pro-Life Action League
By ALAN CESAR

Ladies, PLAL is not your pal.

The Pro-Life Action League, a Chicago-based anti-choice group, has gathered its members and fought tooth and nail to prevent Planned Parenthood from opening its new facility in Aurora.

PLAL seems to think the new 22,000 square-foot facility is there only to perform abortions, but Planned Parenthood expects fewer than 10 percent of its patients will be there for abortion-related services.

Planned Parenthood also provides adoption counseling and placement, cancer screenings, menopause-related services, contraceptives, crisis counseling, and your run-of-the-mill annual gynecological exam.

The crux of this ongoing fight involves how Planned Parenthood obtained their building permit for the site: using the name of a subsidiary, Gemini Office Development, LLC. Steve Trombley, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood/Chicago freely admits they did this to stay under the radar of anti-choice groups. Trombley said the possible protests and violence would have slowed construction.

This kind of corporate subterfuge is standard practice.

“It is not at all uncommon in the U.S. ... for corporations to conduct business via subsidiaries precisely in order to disguise who the real party in interest is.” said Marc Falkoff, NIU associate professor of law.

Nevertheless, PLAL complained about this move, so Aurora Mayor Tom Weisner hired outside counsel to look over the applications. Neither Chicago attorney Richard Martens nor the Kane County State’s Attorney’s Office could find sufficient reason on which the building permit, which had already been granted, could be revoked.

At their first chance to protest, PLAL’s questionable behavior justified Planned Parenthood’s secretive actions. Now that the clinic is open, PLAL is planning to harass the clinic’s employees.

Eric Scheidler, communications director for PLAL, said, “We certainly are willing to picket the homes of abortion workers.”

Scheidler also said they’re willing to challenge city anti-picketing ordinances, which prohibit protests near private residences.

As for how they’ll discover who the workers are and where they live, he said, “We’ll deal with that when (it opens).”

That statement lends credibility to Trombley’s accusations that PLAL members have been photographing license plates at the facility.

This is exactly why Planned Parenthood applied for the permits under another name: to minimize harassment and damages. Construction crews don’t like being harassed any more than nurses, doctors, or you.

Planned Parenthood is there to protect a woman’s reproductive health. PLAL is there to pester people and distort facts. With this in mind, it’s abundantly clear which group really cares about women.


By Stephen  |  Monday, October 8, 2007  |  11:14 am
The actions of PLAL are questionable. However, the actions of Planned Parenthood are reprehensible. The butchering of little girls in the womb is wrong. I'm sorry, but the uproar was justified. I just wish it was louder and came with a better outcome.

When does a girl gain her human rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of hapiness? What is the point in time where one second she doesn't have life and the next second she does? The only reasonable answer is at conception. Since that is the case, abortion is morally wrong, and although it is legal, as are horse slaughter houses and once was slavery, it shouldn't be practised and should be abolished. Why sentence a little girl to death for something she didn't commit? If a rapist can't be executed, then why can a little girl be?
By HastertVotesAgainstStudentsAgain  |  Tuesday, October 9, 2007  |  1:03 pm
Charming Stephen. You still want to legislate morality?
Planned parenthood broke no laws. Perhaps you would prefer a country like Iran? I think you might like their "legal" system better.
Best wishes.
Comment On This Article

All comments are moderated before being published. We will not edit your comments, but we also will not approve those that are abusive, off-topic, attack another poster or contain information we know to be libelous or false.

During peak weekday viewing times, most comments will be reviewed within six hours. For more detailed information, click here.

After submitting your comment, check below for a confirmation message.


  • Your name:
  • Enter text from image:
  • Your comment:
Sign up to receive Northern Star headlines in your inbox, delivered weekdays at 6 a.m.


Feedback? E-mail us.
Question of the Day
Do you think the media coverage of Barack Obama's campaign has been over the top?
Yes, Obama is everywhere.
No, he's been on equal playing field with John McCain.
I have not been following Obama's campaign.

Real-time updates of recently viewed articles on the site.

1  'We Own The Night' is a clichéd, retread of...

2  Recycling 'just the right thing to do'

3  Text vs. Tinseltown: 'P.S. I Love You'

4  Track of the Day: 'No Excuses' by Alice in Chains

5  Molyneux's book offers brutally honest self-help